TENDOR VS TENDERLINK
A portal is one source. A bid is the whole job.
TenderLink serves the portal layer. Tendor is where your team qualifies, gathers evidence and prepares the response.
TenderLink vs Tendor
| Capability | TenderLink |  |
|---|---|---|
Primary job | Tender portal Buyer process access | Pursuit workflow Supplier-side work |
Opportunity handling | Portal by portal | One internal view Across chosen pursuits |
Bid qualification | Not stated | In the workflow Fit and requirements |
Evidence reuse | Not stated | Approved proof Ready for the response |
Best fit | A buyer portal | A recurring bid process |
Choose by the work you need to run.
When the buyer portal is the source
- You need access to a buyer's official notices, documents or lodgement process.
- Your team is working inside a process defined by that buyer or portal.
When end-to-end pursuit work needs a home
- You need to assess fit, organise approved evidence and prepare a response for final sign-off.
- Your team wants one connected workflow across recurring pursuits.
Questions, answered.
How does Tendor differ from TenderLink?
TenderLink is a tender portal and notification service. Tendor is a supplier-side operating layer for an end-to-end pursuit: deciding whether to pursue it, assembling evidence, preparing the response and managing human-owned final submission.
Does Tendor replace buyer portals?
Tendor runs the supplier team's end-to-end pursuit workflow. A buyer's notice, addenda and submission instructions remain the source of truth for that buyer's process.
Who is Tendor for?
It is for teams with recurring bid work that want a clearer process across discovery, bid/no-bid, approved evidence, response preparation and final submission.
