Drafts aligned to criteria. Polished by humans.
Structures your response against each requirement and pulls matching evidence from your library. Estimators get a draft pack ready for price and polish inside the workspace for any live tender.

What it is
Not a generic LLM rewrite. A drafting layer that knows the evaluator's spine and lands a response laid out against it before a human edits a word.
Criterion-aligned structure
Parses sections, criteria, weightings and mandatories — lays the draft against the evaluator's spine, not a blank page.
Automatic evidence reuse
Each criterion pulls matching CVs, past projects and certifications from your library. Schedule 2 rows in place before a human touches it.
Draft pack output
A submission-ready pack: per-criterion narrative, attached evidence, coverage map of what's answered, half-answered and missing.
How it works
- 01ParseRequirements and weightings extracted from the brief.
- 02AssembleEvidence library matches snapped against each criterion.
- 03DraftSubmission pack handed to estimators for the price-and-polish pass.
- C1 · CAPABILITY
Our delivery team has executed sixteen comparable civil packages across federal, state and council buyers in the past five years — including the M1 Pacific Upgrade and the Cross River Rail enabling works.
PAST PROJECTM1 Pacific Upgrade · 2024 - C2 · KEY PERSONNEL
Project leadership is provided by a Senior Project Manager with twenty-two years of civil delivery in Queensland and a Tier 1 safety record across every engagement on file.
CVSr PM · Civil · QLD - C3 · COMPLIANCE
We hold current ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 certifications, Public Liability cover of $20M, and certificates of currency that we maintain ninety days ahead of every submission window.
CERTIFICATEISO 9001 · current - C4 · COMPARABLE WORK
Three awarded contracts within the buyer's value band sit on the record from the past eighteen months, each delivered on time, within budget and with letters of reference from the client side available on request.
AWARDLogan Hospital · $42M
As you scroll, each paragraph cascades letter-by-letter and the matching evidence chip snaps in beside it. The drafting loop, visualised.
Reads the pack — federal RFTs, enterprise RFPs, council invites — into a structured map of every criterion, mandatory and weighting. Nothing slips off page 47.
For each requirement, pulls the closest match — past project at the value band, CV for the key-personnel ask, ISO the evaluator wants to see. Reuse is the default.
Per-criterion narrative in your voice, evidence attached, coverage map flagging gaps. Estimators land on a 70% draft on the evaluator's spine — time goes to price and win themes.
What it changes
“The draft lands aligned to the evaluator's criteria. My estimators spend their time on price and win themes — not on hunting for the right CV at 11pm.”
First draft lands in hours, not weeks of writing from scratch.
Criterion-aligned structure cuts repetition and padding.
Responses with ≥80% criteria matched to evidence outperform cold drafts.
Composite figures from private-preview cohort patterns. Anonymised at the customers' request — talk to sales for references.
Stop writing from a blank page. Start polishing a real draft.
A 30-minute demo against a live tender from your pipeline. We draft the response against the criteria and walk the evidence matches.

