Tendor structures a working draft against each requirement and suggests matching evidence from your library. The bid team reviews every section, source and claim inside the workspace before approval. For public-sector bids, use the Australian government tenders guide, and always treat the buyer's official portal, source notice and current addenda as authoritative.
Not a generic LLM rewrite. A drafting layer that knows the evaluator's spine and lands a response laid out against it before a human edits a word.
Parses sections, criteria, weightings and mandatories — lays the draft against the evaluator's spine, not a blank page.
Each criterion can pull matching CVs, past projects and certifications from your library for the response team to verify and approve.
A review-ready pack: per-criterion narrative, linked evidence and a coverage map of what's answered, incomplete or missing.
Our delivery team has completed comparable projects for public and private buyers, supported by the approved project record linked to this response.
Project leadership is assigned to the nominated delivery lead, with relevant experience and qualifications drawn from the current approved CV.
The response addresses the stated compliance requirements and links the current certificates selected by the response team for verification.
Comparable work from the evidence library is linked to this criterion so the response team can confirm scope, outcomes and client references before submission.
As you scroll, each paragraph cascades letter-by-letter and the matching evidence chip snaps in beside it. The drafting loop, visualised.
Reads the pack — federal RFTs, enterprise RFPs, council invites — into a structured map of every criterion, mandatory and weighting. Nothing slips off page 47.
For each requirement, pulls the closest match — past project at the value band, CV for the key-personnel ask, ISO the evaluator wants to see. Reuse is the default.
Per-criterion narrative in your voice, evidence attached and a coverage map flagging gaps. The response team reviews every draft, source and claim before approval.
“The draft lands aligned to the evaluator's criteria. My estimators spend their time on price and win themes — not on hunting for the right CV at 11pm.”
The draft follows the structure and evaluation criteria in the request documents.
Suggested evidence stays visible for the response team to verify against each claim.
AI drafts are not final responses and are not submitted without human approval.
Workflow summary only. Draft quality depends on the request documents, approved evidence and the response team's review.
AI tender response software helps structure a draft against the request requirements and connect relevant evidence to each response section. Tendor produces working drafts for the bid team to review, edit and approve.
No. AI-generated drafts require human review and approval. The response team remains responsible for checking the buyer's official source notice, current addenda, response rules, claims, evidence, pricing and final submission.
Tendor can suggest approved CVs, project examples, policies and certificates from the workspace evidence library. Reviewers choose what to use and verify that each source is current and supports the claim being made.
A 30-minute demo against a live tender from your pipeline. We draft the response against the criteria and walk the evidence matches.
