Skip to main content
FEASIBILITY · DECIDE

From scattered docs to a structured bid/no-bid call.

Scope, evaluation weights, missing evidence and a recommended next action — pulled into one report your team reads before the deadline conversation. Walk it against a live tender inside the workspace.

What it is

Not a summary. A structured layer over the release pack — turns the docs into something your team can decide against.

  • Scope decomposition

    Every document broken into discrete scope items your team can price and resource. No deliverable chased across three PDFs.

  • Evaluation weight extraction

    Mandatory criteria, weighted scoring and pass/fail gates lifted from the evaluation plan. The buyer's rubric in one place.

  • Evidence gap analysis

    Each criterion checked against your Evidence Library. Expiring insurances, missing CVs and certification gaps flagged before kick-off.

Schematic Feasibility Report — scope, weights, evidence and recommendationFEASIBILITY REPORTPacific Highway · Section 4B · CivilBID · 87%SCOPE · 27 ITEMSWEIGHTS · 4 CRITERIAPRICECAPABILITYMETHODLOCALEVIDENCE · GAPS FLAGGEDPublic Liability · $20MISO 9001CV · Sr PM · QLDPast · M1 Pacific 2024RECOMMENDATIONBid · with partnerHigh fit on capability + price.One CV gap to close before lodgement.
ONE REPORT · SCOPE · WEIGHTS · GAPS · CALL

How it works

  1. STEP 01· READ

    Every document. Every page.

    Reads the full release pack — RFP, response schedules, draft contract, annexures, addenda. Nothing skipped because the team ran out of time on a Friday.

  2. STEP 02· STRUCTURE

    Scope items, weights, gaps.

    Decomposed into scope items mapped to deliverables, criteria mapped to weights, and each criterion cross-checked against your evidence library.

  3. STEP 03· RECOMMEND

    A bid/no-bid call with rationale.

    Bid, no-bid or partner — with a one-screen rationale your bid manager and BD lead can walk into the deadline conversation already aligned on.

What it changes

Scope, evaluation criteria and evidence gaps sit in one reviewable report, with the bid/no-bid rationale recorded beside the source material.

Structured
DECISION INPUTS · IN ONE REPORT

Scope, criteria and evidence gaps share one review surface.

Explicit
LOW-FIT WORK · REASONS RECORDED

Teams can record why an opportunity does not fit.

Reviewable
BID/NO-BID · WITH EVIDENCE GAPS

Decision-makers see the same inputs and rationale.

These are product workflow dimensions, not a measured change in decision time, no-bid rate or win rate.

FEASIBILITY REPORT

Walk into the bid/no-bid call already decided.

A 30-minute demo against a live release pack. We structure the scope, weights and evidence gaps in front of you.